Study: Kids Safer in Car Driven By Grandparent, Not Parent

workmom blogs
RSS feed icon Browse the topics @home and @work. Engage with leading bloggers who offer advice on family and career as well as share stories about our rich workmom experience. Share your comments.

engage!

Not a mom blogger?

browse by

Study: Kids Safer in Car Driven By Grandparent, Not Parent

Posted on July 22, 2011
Study: Kids Safer in Car Driven By Grandparent, Not Parent

If you need your parents to pick up the kids from day camp but worry they might not be safe riding in the car, think again. According to a new study by the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, kids are safer riding in cars when their grandparents – not their parents – are driving.

The study, published in the journal Pediatrics, looked at insurance-claims data from State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. involving children in 15 states from 2003-2007. In 90% of the accidents, parents were driving, but only 10% involved a grandparent driver. Researchers suggest that grandparents drive more cautiously when their grandkids are in the car.

"We were surprised to discover that the injury rate was considerably lower in crashes where grandparents were the drivers," said Dr. Fred Henretig, an emergency medicine specialist at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the study's lead author. "Perhaps grandparents are made more nervous about the task of driving with the 'precious cargo' of their grandchildren and establish more cautious driving habits to compensate for any age-related challenges.”

 

 

 

 

comments (4)

What an interesting

J3rrYcid's picture
by J3rrYcid on August 02, 2012
What an interesting discovery. One might think that older folks would drive their car more dangerously because they had slower reflexes, but their slow driving speed and experience kept the children from harm. I would definitely trust my parents more to drive my kids around now. Thomas - http://www.carid.com/

I know it may sound a little

CaraVan1's picture
by CaraVan1 on May 08, 2012
I know it may sound a little weird, but there is also the possibility that less grandparents drove their grandchildren around and hence accounting for less of them being involved in accidents.

Let me clarify the results of

Barbara Turvett's picture
by Barbara Turvett on July 25, 2011

Let me clarify the results of the study, just reported in the journal Pediatrics. In a nearly five-year period, in a sample of children who were driven by parents and children who were driven by grandparents, the children driven by grandparents made up 9.5% of the sample of children but resulted in only 6.6% of the total injuries. So adjusting for the number of times parents drove kids versus the number of time grandparents drove kids, the percentage of injuries was less when grandparents drove than when parents drove. Quoting the study results: “Injuries were reported for 1302 children, for an overall injury rate of 1.02 (95% CI: 0.90 –1.17) per 100 child occupants. These represented 161 weighted injuries (0.70% injury rate) with grandparent drivers and 2293 injuries (1.05% injury rate) with parent drivers." You can read the whole study online at Pediatrics.org.

Hope this helps everyone understand the results better.

Barbara Turvett, Deputy Editor, Working Mother

Well, this article seems to

PhilHiker's picture
by PhilHiker on July 25, 2011
Well, this article seems to fall victim to the "correlation" effect as opposed to "cause and effect". It says 90% of the time, the parents are driving when accidents with kids occur. Are we all forgetting that parents are driving their kids 90% of the time?! Of course the stats are going to read like this. That percent would be even higher for me. Both my parents AND my husband's parents live two states away. How many opportunities are there for the kids to even ride with their grandparents on a regular basis? Sorry, but this seems like common sense to me.
Your Comment
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use